Tag: overtreatment

Long-term active surveillance for prostate cancer: answers and questions

This 2014 editorial by Dr. Matthew R. Cooperberg discusses the evolving role of active surveillance (AS) in managing low-risk prostate cancer. It emphasizes that AS is a viable strategy to avoid overtreatment and associated morbidities in men with indolent disease. The article highlights the need for standardized AS protocols, including

Read More »

Gleason score 3+3=6 prostatic adenocarcinoma is not benign and the current debate is unhelpful to clinicians and patients

This article critically examines the persistent debate over the classification of Gleason score (GS) 3+3=6 prostate adenocarcinoma. Despite its typically indolent clinical course and low likelihood of metastasis, the tumor meets histopathologic criteria for malignancy and shares molecular features with more aggressive forms. The authors argue that labeling GS 3+3=6

Read More »

Active Surveillance for Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer

This article reviews the role of active surveillance in managing intermediate-risk prostate cancer. It examines current evidence supporting the use of active surveillance for this patient group, considering factors like tumor characteristics, patient age, and life expectancy. The study suggests that active surveillance can be a reasonable alternative to aggressive

Read More »

Active Surveillance for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer-An Evolving International Standard of Care

This article explores the evolving role of active surveillance in the management of low-risk prostate cancer. The study reviews international guidelines and clinical outcomes, highlighting the benefits of active surveillance in avoiding overtreatment and preserving quality of life. It emphasizes that with proper patient selection and monitoring, active surveillance is

Read More »

Prostate cancer–uncertainty and a way forward

This editorial discusses the findings of a study comparing radical prostatectomy to observation in men with localized prostate cancer, emphasizing the uncertainty in determining the optimal management strategy. The study found no significant difference in all-cause mortality between men undergoing surgery and those under observation, though surgery reduced disease-specific mortality

Read More »